16 February 2007

Diamonds: Symbols of love or of war?

While sounds of gun shots, screaming children and crying women filled the cinema, she looked at her engagement ring. No longer did she see a sparkling symbol of eternal love. She saw blood, gore, violence, hatred, war and young boys being drugged and trained to shoot to kill. She saw the pain of women, losing their sons and their dignity, she saw young girls' legs being spread apart by grown men, possessed by an animal-like sexual force.

More than one out of ten purchasable diamonds can be classified as a Blood Diamonds, stones that are mined in a war zone, and sold in order to finance that particular war or uprising. The vast majority of blood diamonds or conflict diamonds are from Africa, from countries such as Angola, Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone, Liberia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Here war lords have used and are using the profit of diamond mining and sales - worth billions of dollars – to fuel war and conflict by for instance buying arms.

While peace has descended upon Angola, Sierra Leone and Liberia – after many decades of war, military terrorism and human suffering – the situation in the Democratic Republic remains one of despair and tragedy. Here, diamonds are a major engine that fuels a conflict that has claimed many hundreds of thousands of lives. The same story counts for Ivory Coast.

With 1,5 out of ten diamonds being blood tainted, the chance of buying a war stone is considerable. Those diamond lovers who refuse to be part of a conflict in a far away country have few options, of which the most important one is to insist that their jeweler or diamond dealer provides them with information that proves the stone is clean one.

Think again before swiping your credit card while a smiling diamond dealer wraps up your precious stone. Men should ask whether the engagement ring for their wife to be is war free, or if it was used to fuel conflict and war. Women wanting to treat themselves to a sparkly necklace should do the same. And diamond dealers should take responsibility too, by only offering clean diamonds and providing their customers with the necessary proof about the nature of the stone.

Myself, I refuse to wear diamonds. Because you never know what you gonna get, as most retailers cannot guarantee that the stone you laid eyes on is not a conflict diamond. And would you want to have a ring around your finger for which – possibly - a little boy has had his hand chopped off with a machete? For which a young girl was forced to open her legs for drunk militiamen? For which several countries were drawn into a spiral of conflict, violence and sorrow? I don’t think so.


Miriam Mannak - Africa in the News / Cape Town - South Africa

1 Comments:

Anonymous Ronli said...

Good words.

4:38 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home